No account yet?
Translate This Website
ngimg0 ngimg1 ngimg2 ngimg3 ngimg4 ngimg5 ngimg6 ngimg7
 
Venus & Adonis | Malthouse Theatre & Bell Shakespeare Print E-mail
Written by Jack Teiwes   
Thursday, 17 April 2008
Venus and Adonis | Bell Shakespeare CompanyVenus and Adonis marks the beginning of some new things for the Bell Shakespeare Company. Co-produced by Malthouse Theatre, this is the inaugural production of Mind’s Eye, Bell’s new development arm. Notably, it is also a production of one of Shakespeare’s great works, but rather than being a play, it is a sonnet. Comprising almost twelve hundred lines, Venus and Adonis is a perfect length for a one-act piece of theatre, translating to about an hour onstage. Given the sonnet’s basis in a narrative myth, one might think that dramatic adaptation would be straightforward, but this is not the approach taken by director Marion Potts and dramaturge Maryanne Lynch.

Not exactly a direct dramatisation so much as a dramatic exploration, you might be surprised by the method of delivery. Given that the famous sonnet concerns the encounter between Venus, Goddess of Love, and the handsome young human Adonis, one might have expected the cast of this two-hander to be portraying these titular characters. Not so. Instead, Potts and Lynch have taken the intriguing angle of having two actors portray Venus, Melissa Madden Gray and Susan Prior, while leaving the presence of Adonis to be created imaginatively, through a combination of either actor reporting his “lines” (although that is an awkward description of the poetry) to the other, and secondly though their own responses, entreaties and seductions of the boy being directed towards the audience itself, placing us in the position of Adonis. The techniques of delivery vary throughout the piece, with various methods of address employed by the two women who represent the Love Goddess.

It is difficult to say what exactly is the meaningful distinction between these two avatars of Venus. Perhaps they represent different aspects of her personality, the one at times more earthy and confident (Prior), the other more desperate and neurotic (Gray), yet this doesn’t seem altogether consistent. Similarly costumed and much alike in behavior (if not necessarily at the same moments), these two performers seem both separate and yet evidently cut from the same cloth, at times clearly interacting, at others off in their own worlds. This sense of being two sides of the same coin is reinforced by the set design, that of a hideous, vaguely 1960s hotel room that is clearly designed for a single occupant. Both women inhabit this space as though it is their own, fretting and primping over their slightly conservative yet equally sexy outfits, and rearranging their identical (but differently coloured) hairdos, which take the form of bizarrely voluminous, floor-length ponytails, like the tresses of some seductive yet dangerous gorgon.

What this costume and production design (by Anna Tregloan) seems to be driving at is a mix of the weird and the mundane, one suspects in response to the characterisation of Venus implicit in Shakespeare’s text. For all her notional godhood, Venus is a significantly human figure, and although she has the ability to restrain Adonis against his will, she is otherwise presented as being much the same as any lovestruck mortal woman. Or perhaps lovestruck taken to the Nth degree: today she’d probably be called a stalker! Her sentiments, however extreme, are recognisably human, those of a woman passionately and intemperately smitten. The production’s externalisation of this comes in the form of not only the mundane scenery but also in the distinctly modern performances.

And what performances they are! Varied, certainly. Unpredictable. Frequently very broad at times, even to the point of drastic overacting, although clearly done so on purpose. The term “desperate and dateless” springs to mind early on, with the dual Venus doing a lot of shtick involving hungrily running to see if anyone is arriving at the elevator to see her/them, and later a lot of hilariously awkward attempts at lewd seductiveness. With the actors doing a lot of business and throwing in the occasional “unscripted” word of exclamation, the production nevertheless contains a relatively comprehensive recitation of the sonnet’s text, but one that is densely interwoven with this complex, volatile performativity. Always centre stage, however, is the exploration of Venus’ love, lust, desire, desperation – her very human feelings. It is quite evident that this production is approaching the material as something of an examination of female sexuality, and we certainly run through a wide spectrum thereof, between the two Venuses and their laundry list of approaches to wooing Adonis.

Since bringing Shakespeare to life can sometimes be a challenge for actors even given the benefit of the inherently dramatic give-and-take of a play’s dialogue, Potts and her team’s ability to craft a theatrically viable piece of staging from the lines of a lyrical poem is admirable. Venus and Adonis contains many different levels of performance, from the bawdy to the earnest, the farcical and the heartbreaking, the spoken and the sung, aided by a musical trio occasionally revealed when the blinds are opened to reveal a forest beyond. Sound effects are also used to interesting effect, as well as a little multimedia. Indeed, the at times elusive and nuanced nature of this production are such that it is probably a good idea to have re-read the sonnet immediately beforehand in order to better absorb this engrossing and challenging treatment.

Bell Shakespeare’s Venus and Adonis may be a little abstract for some, but it is a very entertaining and ultimately fascinating production that merits close attention. As the first offering of Bell’s Mind’s Eye imprimatur, if this is any indication of its quality let us hope it will be the first of many.


Malthouse Theatre & Bell Shakespeare present
Venus and Adonis
By William Shakespeare

Venue: Beckett Theatre | The CUB Malthouse, 113 Sturt Street Southbank, Victoria
Dates: April 11 - May 4
Bookings: www.malthousetheatre.com.au




Share this article
Digg!Del.icio.us!Google!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Yahoo!

Quote this review on your site | E-mail

Comments (4)
1. 23-04-2008 17:42
 
My verdict: 
in Numbers: 2/10 
In a word: boring 
In three words: post modern silliness 
The two positives first: 
1. The three musicians secured in a zoo-like cage (I always had the inclination that that's where they belong anyway) in a rainforest setting (unmotivated but be it):a visual delight.  
2 Shakespeare's text is for a cast of three: narrator, Venus and Adonis. To transform just this into a play for three actors - maybe even female Venus and a male Adonis - would be pleasant but bland. To have to same sex actors reciting the text in ever changing roles gives it a most intriguing tension - and prevents the spectator from falling asleep: at least (s)he can at any given time occupy him/herself with keeping track who is who at the moment. 
The rest is weeping: 
1. Shakespeare's text in erotic - highly erotic. The show's hard trying eroticism is but pathetic. 
2. This show's silly, shallow Pop-muzak. - notwithstanding the ladies' fine singing voices - just finishes off the great musicality of The Bard's text. 
3. One will never get why "...lest thou shall steel my heart and being steel's, soft, sighs, can never grave it" is a seductive snake’s sensuous hissing, when it is exclaimed in uttermost passion “... letht thou shall thteel it and being thteel'd, thoft, thighth..."  
4. The microphone - the amateur's little helper - strongly supports the fashionable decline of elocution: why worry about the texT, when an amplified "tex" will do? 
5. Motel. Motel? 
6. Not impressed. Maybe mediocre texs need directors to be staged. Maybe really ingenious texts should just be read? After this disappointment I am looking forward to HEARing the reading of "Venus and Adonis" in Melbourne on Sat., 26th of April.
Guest
 
wolfgang eubel
2. 24-04-2008 00:32
 
A sonnet - be it English, Italian, Petrarchan or Shakespearean - is 14 lines.
Guest
 
Georgie
3. 29-04-2008 15:10
 
The meaning of a word (e.g. 'sonnet') is its use.(Doesnt make this statement truer, but this dicovery has been been made and written down by L. Wittgenstein). 
Besides: 14 liners are 152/154: one of "The Sonnets" actually has 1 line more and and one 1 line less - apparently for good reasons. Don't know whether Petrarca etc symbolized away with the numbers of lines as well though.
Guest
 
wolfgang eubel
4. 02-05-2008 11:24
 
Venus and Adonis is certainly not a sonnet, by any definition! It's an epic poem written in sextuplets, verse forms known as, believe it or not, "Venus and Adonis" after this poem. Poets have made sonnets of different lengths, and sonnets that don't rhyme (Ted Berrigan being the prime example), but they still argue for the unity of argument and thought that binds a sonnet together; quite different from narrative poetry. 
 
I loved the show, myself. Hard to bring a poem to life on stage, even this one, without turning it into something else, and I thought they did an amazing job of transforming a poem into theatre.
Guest
 
Alison Croggon

Write Comment
  • Please Note: All comments are reviewed by a Site Administrator before being published.

Name:
Comment:

Code:* Code

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4

 
Saturday, 22 November 2008


What's On Today

Archive
 

Popular

The Hypocrite | Melbourne Theatre Company

article thumbnail Outstanding among the actors is Garry McDonald, who blasts on to the stage with a tempestuous energy, sweeping the play along in a torrent of words.
Read more

More
share